The Future of U.S. Space Exploration

Recently, Nature posted an article outlining the results of a survey on what steps NASA should take over the 2013-2012 time frame. This is no regular survey. Leading scientists were polled, and they weighed out various proposed missions in light of the likely budget NASA will have. Not only does this survey take the pulse of the scientific community, the results will be a large factor in NASA’s decision-making process for the near-future.

The results? Though there will be minor “economy” missions elsewhere, it looks like robotic missions to Mars will be the focus for the coming ten years… but only if the budget holds together.  And manned missions? Those aren’t even mentioned, but I imagine the budget only includes keeping the International Space Station limping along.

The budget… Back in the days when the U.S. was trying to demonstrate technical superiority over rival nations, the government threw money into the space program and had an unmatched focus.  This is readily apparent when you consider that in just over nine years from Yuri Gagarin’s first manned orbital flight, the U.S. had landed Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the moon.  Nine years!

Fast forward 42 years and the U.S. space program has all the same excitement and issues of our Social Security program – everyone wants it, no one wants to pay for it, and who knows what it will look like in the future if it actually makes it that far. On top of that, each administration makes different mandates. What one President funds, the next one cancels.

NASA, in my opinion, is suffering what every government-funded agency suffers: a lack of clear goals and focus, unrealistic funding based more on political maneuvering than reality, fickle and shifting leadership, and a disconnect from some sort of customer base.  Contrast this with Richard Branson’s Virgin Galactic, and the difference is stark.  If asked which company will be around in 20 years, I’d go with Virgin Galactic every time.

Like all problems, there are no easy fixes.  But if NASA wants to survive, they need to get off the government’s leash and tap more into the private sector. Only when they can truly chart and fund their own way, will they actually be an agency worth saving.

What do you think?


About EDC

EDC is an award-winning author with a passion for telling imaginative stories resonating with universal truths. His latest novel, Runaway, is a futuristic action/adventure inspired by the book of Philemon. EDC was born in Georgia, growing up in the suburbs of Atlanta, where he now lives with his wife, Amy, and daughter, Emma. Besides writing and being employed as an analyst in the airline industry, he has worked as a volunteer with youth, church planting, and Compassion International. He enjoys landscape gardening, listening to alternative rock, and playing the swordfight game on Wii Sports Resort.
This entry was posted in Blogs and the Web, News and Info, Opinion, Science and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s